What decision are you facing? * Include context: org size, stakeholders, what triggered this, options you're weighing, and what success looks like.
Writing prompts (optional) What are you deciding, and why now? What options are on the table? Who cares most about the outcome? What would you regret if you got this wrong? What constraints are you facing related to this decision? * Timeline, budget, headcount, legal or regulatory limits, politics, non-negotiables, and cost of delay.
How should we analyze this? * Choose the lens that matches how you want the AI to examine your decision.
Compare options openly Balanced analysis across paths. No preferred direction assumed. Challenge my leaning Pressure-testing of the plan you are currently considering to produce a thorough analysis with downsides and blind spots. Show me the opposition Steelmans the strongest opposing case — what a serious skeptic would argue against your lean, so you can be ready for it. Risk-first Thorough downside scan. Risks, blind spots, and hidden assumptions front and center. Widen the option set An evaluation of your described situation, inclusive of alternative paths and adjacent impacting factors.
Open questions whose answers might change the recommendation What you still don't know, and would want answered before committing. If the answer could flip which option you choose, list it here.
What happens next
Each model runs Risk, Reversibility, and Stakeholders lenses on your brief, may ask targeted follow-up questions, then produces a structured decision brief. Compare models side by side, merge them into a Unified Brief, or discuss the results.
Run decision analysis (recommended) Three lenses · follow-up questions when needed · structured brief per model
Explore with a flexible format The model chooses its own structure. Useful for experiments, not the main brief workflow.